Tag: functional disorders critique

Case Report: The intersection of psychiatry and medicine: diagnostic and ethical insights from case studies

Abstract:

The intersection of psychiatry and medicine presents unique diagnostic and ethical challenges, particularly for conditions involving significant brain-body interactions, such as psychosomatic, somatopsychic, and complex systemic disorders. This article explores the historical and contemporary issues in diagnosing such conditions, emphasizing the fragmentation of medical and psychiatric knowledge, biases in clinical guidelines, and the mismanagement of complex illnesses.

Diagnostic errors often arise from insufficient integration between general medicine and psychiatry, compounded by the reliance on population-based guidelines that neglect individual patient needs. Misclassification of conditions like myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), Lyme disease, and fibromyalgia as psychosomatic or psychogenic has led to stigmatization and delayed care. While these conditions are referenced as emblematic examples of misclassified and poorly understood disorders, the five clinical cases discussed in this article do not directly illustrate these diseases. Instead, they exemplify shared diagnostic and ethical dilemmas at the medicine–psychiatry interface, including uncertainty, fragmentation, and the risk of epistemic injustice.

The article critically examines terms like medically unexplained symptoms and functional disorders, highlighting their limitations and potential for misuse. Case examples underscore the consequences of diagnostic inaccuracies and the urgent need for improved approaches. Ethical considerations are also explored, emphasizing respecting patient experiences, promoting individualized care, and acknowledging the inherent uncertainties in medical diagnosis.

Advances in technologies such as brain imaging and molecular diagnostics offer hope for bridging the gap between psychiatry and medicine, enabling more accurate assessments and better patient outcomes. The article concludes by advocating comprehensive training at the medicine-psychiatry interface and a patient-centered approach that integrates clinical observation, research insights, and a nuanced understanding of mind-body dynamics.

Source: Monaco F, Vignapiano A, D’Angelo M, Raffone F, Di Stefano V, Boccia A, Longobardi A, Gruttola BD, Fornaro M, Corrivetti G, Martino I, Steardo L, Steardo L Jr. Case Report: The intersection of psychiatry and medicine: diagnostic and ethical insights from case studies. Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 22;16:1576179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1576179. PMID: 40330647; PMCID: PMC12053010. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053010/ (Full text)

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and other common autonomic disorders are not functional neurologic disorders

Introduction:

In the past 4 years of COVID-19 and Long COVID, a renewed interest in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and other autonomic disorders brought to light a common misconception that these disorders are based in or are associated with functional neurologic disorder (FND). Recently, one narrative review attempted to link autonomic disorders and autonomic nervous system dysfunction with symptoms of FND (1). Others have similarly suggested that Long COVID may be based in functional or somatic etiology (2–5). As medical professionals with expertise in autonomic disorders, we would like to emphasize the distinction between autonomic disorders, autonomic symptoms and FND in order to ensure that appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways are implemented by clinicians.

Source: Blitshteyn S, Treisman GJ, Ruhoy IS, Saperstein DS, Schofield JR, Goodman BP, Davenport TE, Cutchins AC and Grubb BP (2024) Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and other common autonomic disorders are not functional neurologic disorders. Front. Neurol. 15:1490744. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1490744 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1490744/full (Full text)

Inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways underpinning chronic fatigue, somatization and psychosomatic symptoms

Abstract:

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this paper is to review recent findings on inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress (IO&NS) pathways in chronic fatigue and somatization disorder.

RECENT FINDINGS: Activation of IO&NS pathways is the key phenomenon underpinning chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): intracellular inflammation, with an increased production of nuclear factor kappa beta (NFkappabeta), cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and inducible NO synthase (iNOS); and damage caused by O&NS to membrane fatty acids and functional proteins. These IO&NS pathways are induced by a number of trigger factors, for example psychological stress, strenuous exercise, viral infections and an increased translocation of LPS from gram-bacteria (leaky gut). The ‘psychosomatic’ symptoms experienced by CFS patients are caused by intracellular inflammation (aches and pain, muscular tension, fatigue, irritability, sadness, and the subjective feeling of infection); damage caused by O&NS (aches and pain, muscular tension and fatigue); and gut-derived inflammation (complaints of irritable bowel). Inflammatory pathways (monocytic activation) are also detected in somatizing disorder.

SUMMARY: ‘Functional’ symptoms, as occurring in CFS and somatization, have a genuine organic cause, that is activation of peripheral and central IO&NS pathways and gut-derived inflammation. The development of new drugs, aimed at treating those disorders, should target these IO&NS pathways.

 

Source: Maes M. Inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways underpinning chronic fatigue, somatization and psychosomatic symptoms. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;22(1):75-83. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19127706