Tag: clinical methodology

Comparison of a 20 degree and 70 degree tilt test in adolescent myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients

Abstract:

Introduction: During a standard 70-degree head-up tilt test, 90% of adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) develop an abnormal reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF). A 70-degree test might not be tolerated by young ME/CFS patients because of the high incidence of syncopal spells. This study examined whether a test at 20 degrees would be sufficient to provoke important reductions in CBF in young ME/CFS patients.

Methods: We analyzed 83 studies of adolescent ME/CFS patients. We assessed CBF using extracranial Doppler measurements of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries supine and during the tilt. We studied 42 adolescents during a 20 degree and 41 during a 70 degree test.

Results: At 20 degrees, no patients developed postural orthostatic tachycardia (POTS), compared to 32% at 70 degrees (p = 0.0002). The CBF reduction during the 20 degree tilt of -27(6)% was slightly less than during the reduction during a 70 degree test [-31(7)%; p = 0.003]. Seventeen adolescents had CBF measurements at both 20 and 70 degrees. The CBF reduction in these patients with both a 20 and 70 degrees test was significantly larger at 70 degrees than at 20 degrees (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: A 20 degree tilt in young ME/CFS patients resulted in a CBF reduction comparable to that in adult patients during a 70 degree test. The lower tilt angle provoked less POTS, emphasizing the importance of using the 70 degree angle for that diagnosis. Further study is needed to explore whether CBF measurements during tilt provide an improved standard for classifying orthostatic intolerance.

Source: van Campen CLMC, Rowe PC, Visser FC. Comparison of a 20 degree and 70 degree tilt test in adolescent myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients. Front Pediatr. 2023 May 12;11:1169447. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1169447. PMID: 37252045; PMCID: PMC10213432. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213432/ (Full text)

Clinical methodology and its implications for the study of therapeutic interventions for chronic fatigue syndrome: a commentary

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex, multisymptom illness of unknown etiology. A variety of operational case definitions based on symptom report have been developed that share some common clinical features. Patients often come to clinical presentation after months or, more typically, years of symptomatic distress. Comorbid presentation with psychiatric illnesses has been noted.

Due to these fundamental issues, the impact of patient selection and the specification of the methods of outcome assessment loom large in therapeutic studies of CFS. While a substantial body of research has focused on increasing our understanding of the basic pathobiology of CFS, there have been comparatively fewer studies that have addressed the problems of patient characterization and outcome assessment. The role of clinical methodology in the study of the therapeutics of CFS is not trivial, and may confound our understanding of pragmatic recommendations for treatment.

 

Source: Demitrack MA. Clinical methodology and its implications for the study of therapeutic interventions for chronic fatigue syndrome: a commentary. Pharmacogenomics. 2006 Apr;7(3):521-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16610962