Enhancing the management of long COVID in general practice: a scoping review

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID is a multifaceted condition, and it has impacted a considerable proportion of those with acute-COVID-19. Affected patients often have complex care needs requiring holistic and multidisciplinary care, the kind routinely provided in general practice. However, there is limited evidence regarding GP interventions.

Aim: This study aimed to address this issue by conducting a scoping review of literature on GP management of Long COVID.

Design & setting: Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage scoping review framework with recommendations by Levac et al. was used.

Method: PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Google searches were conducted to identify relevant peer-reviewed/grey literature, and study selection process was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Braun and Clarke’s ‘Thematic Analysis’ approach was used to interpret data.

Results: Nineteen of 972 identified papers were selected for review. These included peer-reviewed articles and grey literature spanning a wide range of countries. Six themes were identified regarding GP management of Long COVID, these being: (i) GP uncertainty, (ii) Listening and empathy, (iii) Assessment and monitoring of symptoms, (iv) Coordinating access to appropriate services, (v) Facilitating provision of continual and integrated multi-disciplinary care and (vi) Need to facilitate psychological support.

Conclusion: The findings show that GPs can and have played a key role in the management of Long COVID, and that patient care can be improved through better understanding of patient experiences, standardised approaches for symptom identification/treatment, and facilitation of access to multidisciplinary specialist services when needed. Future research evaluating focused GP interventions is needed.

Source: Brennan A, Broughan JM, McCombe G, Brennan J, Collins C, Fawsitt R, Gallagher J, Guérandel A, O’Kelly B, Quinlan D, Lambert JS, Cullen W. Enhancing the management of long COVID in general practice: a scoping review. BJGP Open. 2022 Mar 7:BJGPO.2021.0178. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0178. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35256357.  https://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2022/03/06/BJGPO.2021.0178 (Full text available as PDF file)

Characteristics and impact of Long Covid: Findings from an online survey

Abstract:

Background: Long Covid is a public health concern that needs defining, quantifying, and describing. We aimed to explore the initial and ongoing symptoms of Long Covid following SARS-CoV-2 infection and describe its impact on daily life.

Methods: We collected self-reported data through an online survey using convenience non-probability sampling. The survey enrolled adults who reported lab-confirmed (PCR or antibody) or suspected COVID-19 who were not hospitalised in the first two weeks of illness. This analysis was restricted to those with self-reported Long Covid. Univariate comparisons between those with and without confirmed COVID-19 infection were carried out and agglomerative hierarchical clustering was used to identify specific symptom clusters, and their demographic and functional correlates.

Results: We analysed data from 2550 participants with a median duration of illness of 7.6 months (interquartile range (IQR) 7.1-7.9). 26.5% reported lab-confirmation of infection. The mean age was 46.5 years (standard deviation 11 years) with 82.8% females and 79.9% of participants based in the UK. 89.5% described their health as good, very good or excellent before COVID-19. The most common initial symptoms that persisted were exhaustion, chest pressure/tightness, shortness of breath and headache. Cognitive dysfunction and palpitations became more prevalent later in the illness. Most participants described fluctuating (57.7%) or relapsing symptoms (17.6%). Physical activity, stress, and sleep disturbance commonly triggered symptoms. A third (32%) reported they were unable to live alone without any assistance at six weeks from start of illness. 16.9% reported being unable to work solely due to COVID-19 illness. 37.0% reported loss of income due to illness, and 64.4% said they were unable to perform usual activities/duties. Acute systems clustered broadly into two groups: a majority cluster (n = 2235, 88%) with cardiopulmonary predominant symptoms, and a minority cluster (n = 305, 12%) with multisystem symptoms. Similarly, ongoing symptoms broadly clustered in two groups; a majority cluster (n = 2243, 88.8%) exhibiting mainly cardiopulmonary, cognitive symptoms and exhaustion, and a minority cluster (n = 283, 11.2%) exhibiting more multisystem symptoms. Belonging to the more severe multisystem cluster was associated with more severe functional impact, lower income, younger age, being female, worse baseline health, and inadequate rest in the first two weeks of the illness, with no major differences in the cluster patterns when restricting analysis to the lab-confirmed subgroup.

Conclusion: This is an exploratory survey of Long Covid characteristics. Whilst this is a non-representative population sample, it highlights the heterogeneity of persistent symptoms, and the significant functional impact of prolonged illness following confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. To study prevalence, predictors and prognosis, research is needed in a representative population sample using standardised case definitions.

Source: Ziauddeen N, Gurdasani D, O’Hara ME, Hastie C, Roderick P, Yao G, Alwan NA. Characteristics and impact of Long Covid: Findings from an online survey. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0264331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264331. PMID: 35259179; PMCID: PMC8903286. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903286/ (Full text)

Early clues regarding the pathogenesis of long-COVID

Abstract:

Intense investigation into the predictors and determinants of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), including ‘long COVID’, is underway. Recent studies provide clues to the mechanisms that might drive this condition, with the goal of identifying host or virus factors that can be intervened upon to prevent or reverse PASC.

Source: Peluso MJ, Deeks SG. Early clues regarding the pathogenesis of long-COVID. Trends Immunol. 2022 Apr;43(4):268-270. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Mar 8. PMID: 35272932; PMCID: PMC8901423. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901423/ (Full text)

Long-term outcomes of pediatric infections: from traditional infectious diseases to long covid

Abstract:

There is limited evidence available on the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. In this article, the authors analyze the recent evidence on pediatric long covid and lessons learnt from a pediatric post-covid unit in Rome, Italy. To gain a better understanding of the concerns raised by parents and physicians in relation to the potential long-term consequences of this novel infection, it is important to recognize that long-term effect of a post-infectious disease is not a new phenomenon.

Source: Buonsenso D, Di Gennaro L, Rose C, Morello R, D’Ilario F, Zampino G, Piazza M, Boner AL, Iraci C, O’Connell S, Cohen VB, Esposito S, Munblit D, Reena J, Sigfrid L, Valentini P. Long-term outcomes of pediatric infections: from traditional infectious diseases to long covid. Future Microbiol. 2022 Mar 10:10.2217/fmb-2022-0031. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2022-0031. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35264003; PMCID: PMC8910780.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910780/ (Full text)

The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19

Abstract:

Considerable research effort has been made worldwide to decipher the immune response triggered upon severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, identify the drivers of severe and fatal COVID-19, and understand what leads to the prolongation of symptoms after disease resolution. We review the results of almost 2 years of COVID-19 immunology research and discuss definitive findings and remaining questions regarding our understanding of COVID-19 pathophysiology. We discuss emerging understanding of differences in immune responses seen in those with and without Long Covid syndrome, also known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2. We hope that the knowledge gained from this COVID-19 research will be applied in studies of inflammatory processes involved in critical and chronic illnesses, which remain a major unmet need.
Read the full article HERE.
Source: Merad M, Blish CA, Sallusto F, Iwasaki A. The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19. Science. 2022 Mar 11;375(6585):1122-1127. doi: 10.1126/science.abm8108. Epub 2022 Mar 10. PMID: 35271343. https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abm8108 (Full text)

Long Covid at the crossroads: Comparisons and lessons from the treatment of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)

Abstract:

Whilst parallels have been drawn between Long Covid and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), there is a well-documented history of negative stereotyping and marginalisation of patients with ME/CFS. A socio-politically oriented comparison of scientific, clinical and societal responses to Long Covid and ME/CFS is thus important to prevent similar harms arising among Long Covid patients. We identify four reasons for injustices in the treatment of ME/CFS patients, and discuss the risk of Long Covid following a similar trajectory. We conclude with policy and practice recommendations to help prevent such injustices arising again, including consideration of critical reflexivity in medical education.

Source: Hunt J, Blease C, Geraghty KJ. Long Covid at the crossroads: Comparisons and lessons from the treatment of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). J Health Psychol. 2022 Mar 27:13591053221084494. doi: 10.1177/13591053221084494. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35341334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35341334/

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Long COVID symptoms

Abstract:

Background Ongoing symptoms or the development of new symptoms following a SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis has caused a complex clinical problem known as “:Long COVID”: (LC). This has introduced further pressure on global healthcare systems as there appears to be a need for ongoing clinical management of these patients. LC personifies heterogeneous symptoms at varying frequencies. The most complex symptoms appear to be driven by the neurology and neuropsychiatry spheres.

Methods A systematic protocol was developed, peer reviewed and published in PROSPERO. The systematic review included publications from the 1st of December 2019-30th June 2021 published in English. Multiple electronic databases were used. The dataset has been analysed using a random-effects model and a subgroup analysis based on geographical location. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were established based on the data identified.

Results Of the 302 studies, 49 met the inclusion criteria, although 36 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 36 studies had a collective sample size of 11598 LC patients. 18 of the 36 studies were designed as cohorts and the remainder were cross-sectional. Symptoms of mental health, gastrointestinal, cardiopulmonary, neurological, and pain were reported.

Conclusions The quality that differentiates this meta-analysis is that they are cohort and cross-sectional studies with follow-up. It is evident that there is limited knowledge available of LC and current clinical management strategies may be suboptimal as a result. Clinical practice improvements will require more comprehensive clinical research, enabling effective evidence-based approaches to better support patients.

Source: Arun Natarajan, Ashish Shetty, Gayathri Delanerolle, Yutian Zeng, Yingzhe Zhang, Vanessa Raymont, Shanaya Rathod, Sam Halabi, Kathryn Elliot, Peter Phiri, Jian Qing Shi. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Long COVID symptoms. medRxiv 2022.03.08.22272091; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.08.22272091 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.08.22272091v1.full-text (Full text)

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome presented as a cerebral and systemic vasculitis: a case report

To the Editor,

Post-acute Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome is defined as the appearance of symptoms or an organ dysfunction, which occurs at least 4 weeks after the first COVID-19 manifestations and cannot be explained by any alternative diagnosis []. Neurological complications are also well recognized, and include acute cerebrovascular events, encephalopathy, meningoencephalitis, Guillain–Barre syndrome, demyelination, dementia, parkinsonism, and others []. On the other hand, cerebral vasculitis is one of the causes which can lead to brain damage related to COVID-19 infection []. We present a 69-year-old male with systemic vasculitis and central nervous system (CNS) involvement as a manifestation of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Ivanovic, Jovana et al. “Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome presented as a cerebral and systemic vasculitis: a case report.” Acta neurologica Belgica, 1–3. 13 Mar. 2022, doi:10.1007/s13760-022-01923-2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918071/ (Full text)

Dyspnea in Post-COVID Syndrome following Mild Acute COVID-19 Infections: Potential Causes and Consequences for a Therapeutic Approach

Abstract:

Dyspnea, shortness of breath, and chest pain are frequent symptoms of post-COVID syndrome (PCS). These symptoms are unrelated to organ damage in most patients after mild acute COVID infection. Hyperventilation has been identified as a cause of exercise-induced dyspnea in PCS. Since there is a broad overlap in symptomatology with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), causes for dyspnea and potential consequences can be deduced by a stringent application of assumptions made for ME/CFS in our recent review papers.

One of the first stimuli of respiration in exercise is caused by metabolic feedback via skeletal muscle afferents. Hyperventilation in PCS, which occurs early on during exercise, can arise from a combined disturbance of a poor skeletal muscle energetic situation and autonomic dysfunction (overshooting respiratory response), both found in ME/CFS. The exaggerated respiratory response aggravating dyspnea does not only limit the ability to exercise but further impairs the muscular energetic situation: one of the buffering mechanisms to respiratory alkalosis is a proton shift from intracellular to extracellular space via the sodium-proton-exchanger subtype 1 (NHE1), thereby loading cells with sodium. This adds to two other sodium loading mechanisms already operative, namely glycolytic metabolism (intracellular acidosis) and impaired Na+/K+ATPase activity.

High intracellular sodium has unfavorable effects on mitochondrial calcium and metabolism via sodium-calcium-exchangers (NCX). Mitochondrial calcium overload by high intracellular sodium reversing the transport mode of NCX to import calcium is a key driver for fatigue and chronification. Prevention of hyperventilation has a therapeutic potential by keeping intracellular sodium below the threshold where calcium overload occurs.

Source: Wirth KJ, Scheibenbogen C. Dyspnea in Post-COVID Syndrome following Mild Acute COVID-19 Infections: Potential Causes and Consequences for a Therapeutic Approach. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 12;58(3):419. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030419. PMID: 35334595. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/3/419/htm (Full text)