Category: Overview

The debate: myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Almost every aspect of myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) and chronic fatigue syndrome is the subject of disagreement and uncertainty — something that has undoubtedly hampered recognition, understanding and research. Although the pathogenesis remains the subject of intense medical debate, a number of predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating factors are now starting to emerge. Therapeutic nihilism is no longer appropriate as there is a great deal that can be done to alleviate some of the more distressing symptoms and improve quality of life for these patients.

 

Source: Shepherd C. The debate: myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Nurs. 2006 Jun 22-Jul 12;15(12):662-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16835542

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update focusing on phenomenology and pathophysiology

Abstract:

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic fatigue syndrome is a controversial condition especially concerning its clinical definition and aetiopathogenesis. Most recent research progress has been made in phenomenology and pathophysiology and we focused our review on these two areas.

RECENT FINDINGS: The phenomenology research supports the notion of a discrete fatigue syndrome which can be distinguished from depression and anxiety. The current case definition, however, may need an improvement based on empirical data. Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of chronic fatigue syndrome continue to demonstrate the involvement of the central nervous system. Hyperserotonergic state and hypoactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis constitute other findings, but the question of whether these alterations are a cause or consequence of chronic fatigue syndrome still remains unanswered. Immune system involvement in the pathogenesis seems certain but the findings on the specific mechanisms are still inconsistent. Genetic studies provide some evidence of the syndrome being a partly genetic condition, but environmental effects seem to be still predominant and identification of specific genes is still at a very early stage.

SUMMARY: The recent findings suggest that further research is needed in improving the current case definition; investigating overlaps and boundaries among various functional somatic syndromes; answering the question of whether the pathophysiologic findings are a cause or consequence; and elucidating the involvement of the central nervous system, immune system and genetic factors.

 

Source: Cho HJ, Skowera A, Cleare A, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update focusing on phenomenology and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;19(1):67-73. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16612182

 

Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: an update for athletic trainers

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Primary fibromyalgia syndrome (PFS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are clinical conditions characterized by a variety of symptoms, including prominent fatigue, myalgia, and sleep disturbances. Although the incidence of these syndromes is infrequent, when manifested, they can completely disrupt the life and career of those affected. When they are manifested within the physically active population, they can jeopardize the futures of the most promising athletes.

DATA SOURCES: Public documents available from the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, and the National Institutes of Health were researched. MEDLINE and CINAHL were researched back to 1988 with the following key words: chronic fatigue syndrome, primary fibromyalgia syndrome, sports participant, physically active, mononucleosis, myalgia, rehabilitation, reconditioning, athlete, and sports medicine.

DATA SYNTHESIS: The definition of CFS in 1988 included disabling fatigue of unknown case of at least 6 months’ duration. Primary fibromyalgia syndrome was once considered a subsyndrome of CFS. PFS is diagnostically characterized as a nonarticular rheumatism. The “yuppie flu” was a catch phrase of the 1980s for CFS, which was then named chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome. Initially the condition was thought of as simple infectious mononucleosis, but we now have a medically defined set of symptoms to describe what are called CFS and PFS. Training interruptions, feelings of loss of control, and concerns over possible psychologic or psychiatric referral can occur. Relaxation therapy, exercise, image therapy, serotonin supplementation, and antiviral therapy are in clinical trials now as the best options for management of CFS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Current statistics on those affected by CFS and PFS in the general population are less than 2% for CFS and 2% for PFS. Comprehensive documentation of signs, symptoms, and complaints, along with judicious physician follow-up, are important during the course of treatment leading up to and following a diagnosis of CFS or PFS. Professional evaluation of the affected player’s neuropsychological status is important and necessary as a care plan is developed.

 

Source: Cramer CR. Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: an update for athletic trainers. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):359-61. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1320588/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

During the past two decades, there has been heated debate about chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) among researchers, practitioners, and patients. Few illnesses have been discussed so extensively. The existence of the disorder has been questioned, its underlying pathophysiology debated, and an effective treatment opposed; patients’ organisations have participated in scientific discussions.

In this review, we look back on several controversies over CFS with respect to its definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. We review issues of epidemiology and clinical manifestations, focusing on the scientific status of CFS. Modern neuroscience and genetics research offer interesting findings for new hypotheses on the aetiology and pathogenesis of the illness. We also discuss promising future issues, such as psychopathophysiology and mechanisms of improvement, and suggest multidisciplinary prospective studies of CFS and fatigue in the general population. These studies should pay particular attention to similarities to and differences from functional somatic syndromes and other fatiguing conditions.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Lancet. 2006]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Lancet. 2006]

 

Source: Prins JB, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):346-55. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16443043

 

Aetiology and pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome: a review

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disease of uncertain aetiology that is characterised by unexplained, severe fatigue associated with a number of typical symptoms. This paper reviews the scientific literature related to current theories about the aetiology and pathogenesis of CFS by focussing on what appear to be the four most significant aspects in the development and perpetuation of this disease: the role of infectious agents as well as immunological, neuroendocrine, and psychiatric factors. A multifactorial model for the aetiology of CFS, which includes and draws together these four aspects, is proposed; and suggestions are offered regarding approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

 

Source: Mihrshahi R, Beirman R. Aetiology and pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. N Z Med J. 2005 Dec 16;118(1227):U1780. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16372029

 

Practitioner review: chronic fatigue syndrome in childhood

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is being increasingly recognized in children and adolescents. Yet comparatively little attention has been given in the literature to management.

METHODS: Description of the main features of the disorder, precipitating and maintaining factors and diagnostic assessment. Outline of different views on the nature and treatment of CFS in childhood. Description of a rehabilitation program based on cognitive behavior therapy and graded activity.

RESULTS: Using adult research criteria, CFS can be diagnosed in children and adolescents. In its severe form it is often triggered by infectious illness episodes. It is commonly associated with mood disorders in the child and with mental distress and high levels of emotional involvement in parents. A number of patient support groups hold the view that CFS is a medical disorder, contest a psychiatric contribution and advocate ‘pacing’ as an approach to rehabilitation which includes avoiding activities. To date there is no empirical evidence for the efficacy of this approach. Research in adults, open and clinical reports in children support the use of graded activity and family cognitive behavior therapy. The main aim is to enable children, with the help of their family, to carry out their own rehabilitation with some support and guidance from a health professional. Engaging the child and family in treatment and forming a therapeutic alliance is a continual process and a crucial aspect of management, as many families view the condition as a medical disorder and are initially ambivalent towards this approach.

CONCLUSIONS: There is controversy about the nature and management of CFS in childhood but a rehabilitation program based on family cognitive behavior therapy can be implemented and seems to hold most promise in the management of children with CFS. Family engagement is a crucial aspect of management.

 

Source: Elena Garralda M, Chalder T. Practitioner review: chronic fatigue syndrome in childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;46(11):1143-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16238661

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: an overview

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) – those lacking identifiable underlying physical disease – are common in all levels of the health care system, and can be associated with severe disability and distress to patients and high cost to health services. Common MUS include pain (including back, chest, abdominal pain, and headache), fatigue, dizziness and ENT (Ear, Nose and Throat) symptoms. Similarly, functional somatic syndromes refer to groups of symptoms lacking disease-specific, demonstrable abnormalities of structure, and are usually defined by specialty or organ system.1 They include irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple chemical sensitivity, chronic pelvic pain, temporomandibular joint dysfunction and more recently Gulf War syndrome. These conditions overlap in their symptoms, aetiology and treatment; prompting some to point out that the similarities outweigh differences between them and that there is utility in considering them collectively rather than separately.2

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462005000300003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

 

Source: Cho HJ, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an overview. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2005 Sep;27(3):174-5. Epub 2005 Oct 4. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462005000300003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome is a relatively unknown and underdiagnosed entity in Italy where its epidemiology remains uncertain, as well as its etiology, although it causes important disability in those affected. Classification criteria by Fukuda are available to diagnose the syndrome. Its epidemiology indicates that it is probably more frequent in Northern countries and it is described in Gulf War veterans. Etiological hypotheses include infectious diseases, immunology and neurology. Among these hypotheses sickness behavior mimes certain aspects of this syndrome and is characterized by a cytokine imbalance in the central nervous system and in the periphery. There are no valid therapies available at the moment. In the laboratory of Immunogenetics, we are constituting a biological bank of the syndrome to study the immunogenetic aspects of the disease in the hope of elucidating some of the obscure areas of its etiopathogenesis.

 

Source: Carlo-Stella N, Lorusso L, Candura SM, Cuccia M. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. Recenti Prog Med. 2004 Nov;95(11):546-52; quiz 560. [Article in Italian] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15598093

 

Chronic/post-viral fatigue syndrome

Chronic / post-viral fatigue syndrome is the diagnosis term Rikstrygdeverket opted for the ICD-10 called “benign myalgic encephalomyelitis / post-viral fatigue syndrome.” Benign myalgic encephalomyelitis has since 1956 designated the epidemic form of this disease picture.”Chronic Fatigue Syndrome” is the Norwegian translation of “chronic fatigue syndrome” which has different meanings according to how it is defined.

Methodological differences from evaluation and diagnosis of chronic / post-viral fatigue syndrome from a study of chronic fatigue syndrome, and states have different therapeutic implications. Rikstrygdeverket bases its diagnosis in the original research definition of “chronic fatigue syndrome” from the Centers for Disease Control in 1988, an illness which later was recognized as benign myalgic encephalomyelitis.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1072526

 

Source: Kreyberg S. Chronic/post-viral fatigue syndrome. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Sep 23;124(18):2382-3. [Article in Norwegian] http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1072526  (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome (cfs)

Abstract:

The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is described based on the revision of Fukuda et al. The question “whether CFS can be discussed as a homogenous disorder?” has been reviewed and the answer is “no”. Other overlapping syndromes are mentioned. Disorders with fatigue as a symptom are depression, somatisation, irritable bowel syndrome, effort-syndrome, hyperventilation, conservation-withdrawal.

Among the pathogenetic factors of CFS immune systems disorders, neuroendocrine abnormalities, autonomic activity, neuroimaging, neuropsychological abnormalities, exercise capacity and muscle function and psychological processes (attribution, perception, symptom avoidance and neutralisation of conflicts) are discussed.

Since CFS cannot be comprehended without knowledge of the ontogenetic development of the affect “fatigue”, it is extensively described. Based on this knowledge, fatigue as an affect and the CFS are embedded in a context, which has as its basis the fight-flight reaction and the conservation-withdrawal reaction. Weighing the evidence, it is concluded that CFS in its varieties can best be understood as a manifestation of the activation of the two biological emergency reactions: fight-flight and conservation-withdrawal.

The physician should interview and examine each individual patient according to the Harvey Cushing dictum: The physician should not only study the diseased organ, but the man with his diseased organ, and not only these. He should comprehend the man with his diseased organ in his environment. This leads to study of the biological, psychological and social factors contributing to each patient’s illness. Work-up and therapy have to be based on this integrated approach. The latter encompasses conflict centred psychotherapy, stepwise increasing physical activation and antidepressive drugs.

 

Source: Adler RH. Chronic fatigue syndrome (cfs). Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 May 15;134(19-20):268-76. http://www.smw.ch/for-readers/archive/backlinks/?url=/docs/archive200x/2004/19/smw-10213.html (Full article)