Long COVID: systemic inflammation and obesity as therapeutic targets

Management of the post-COVID-19 condition—often referred to as long COVID—is a challenge for health-care professionals because of the heterogeneity and complexity of its clinical manifestations and the probable need for multidisciplinary management approaches. Identification and understanding of modifiable determinants associated with manifestations of long COVID would help in the adaptation of treatment pathways for particular phenotypes. In The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, the PHOSP-COVID Collaborative Group report the latest results from the UK-based, multicentre, prospective Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 (PHOSP-COVID) study, in which the investigators identified systemic inflammation and obesity as factors that might be associated with long COVID, representing potentially treatable traits in people with more severe post-COVID-19 symptoms.

In the current report, the PHOSP-COVID Collaborative Group found increased levels of several biomarkers related to systemic inflammation and lung damage in individuals with more severe physical and mental health impairments 1 year after hospital discharge. The presence of increased levels of systemic inflammatory biomarkers (eg, cytokines) in individuals with severe acute COVID-19 has been reported previously. Moreover, the use of anti-inflammatory agents such as corticosteroids or interleukin-6 (IL-6)-blocking agents has been found to be associated with positive outcomes in patients hospitalised with acute COVID-19.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Florencio LL, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Long COVID: systemic inflammation and obesity as therapeutic targets. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Apr 22:S2213-2600(22)00159-X. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00159-X. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35472305; PMCID: PMC9034853. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9034853/ (Full text)

Cardiac tamponade – an unexpected “long COVID-19” complication

Abstract:

Introduction: Year 2020 has been a cornerstone in medical research due to the COVID-19 pandemic
outbreak. The process of understanding the condition brought to light certain organ involvement like
pulmonary or kidney damage or endocrine disbalances, while connection to other types of organ
impairment remain unclear. SARS-CoV-2 has previously been incriminated in cardiac involvement,
ranging from mild symptoms to more severe occurrences such as myocarditis, arrythmias or heart
failure, thus complicating the acute-phase management and worsening patients’ prognosis. Despite being
reported as an acute manifestation in critical COVID-19, cardiac tamponade seems to also occur as a
“long- COVID19” complication. The latter is a distinct yet unclear entity associated with remanent
fatigue or cough, but more severe sequelae like vasculitis or polyneuropathy can occur.

Case report: We report the case of a 42-year-old patient admitted in the intensive care unit for severe
respiratory and renal dysfunction one month after an initial mild episode of COVID-19. RT-PCR for
SARS-CoV-2 on admission was negative. Initial imaging through CT and heart ultrasound revealed the
presence of pericardial effusion but no signs of tamponade were initially obvious. Twelve hours later, the
patient’s state deteriorated with cardiocirculatory failure and signs of obstructive shock. Agents
responsible for severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) such as influenza A and B, adenovirus,
Bordetella pertussis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, coxsackie virus, Chlamydia pneumoniae or parainfluenza
viruses were ruled out. Surprisingly, RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 came back positive, although the
initial test was negative. Repeated imaging confirmed massive circumferential pericardial effusion for
which emergency pericardiocentesis was performed. Fluid was an exudate and histopathology reported
chronic inflammation. RT-PCR testing for Mycoplasma tuberculosis in the pericardial tissue came back
negative.

Conclusions: The case is to our knowledge among the first to report cardiac tamponade one month
after mild COVID-19 infection. The aim of this case report is to raise awareness in the medical
community on the possibility of severe complications targeting major organs in the long-COVID-19
phase.

Source: Cobilinschi, Cristian; Melente, Oana Maria; Bologa, Cristina; Cotae, Ana-Maria; Constantinescu, Laura; et al. Cardiac tamponade – an unexpected “long COVID-19” complication. Germs; Bucharest Vol. 12, Iss. 1, (Mar 2022): 112-117. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4b836e7b0259b3a7fe1c40199f4b9c4c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032454 (Full text)

Long COVID-19: Psychological symptoms in COVID-19 and probiotics as an adjunct therapy

Abstract:

There is an increase in mental health sequelae following COVID-19 infection, with some studies showing a higher prevalence rate of psychiatric sequelae in post-COVID-19 survivors than in the general population. This review discusses the possible causes, prevalence, and risk factors of COVID-19 associated psychological manifestations, namely anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Although the exact cause is yet to be determined, it is likely multifactorial involving environmental, biological, and psychological factors due to the pandemic. Variation exists for risk factors and prevalence, but the female gender and psychiatric disorder history seem to be consistent risk factors across several studies. While conventional psychotropic medications are the common therapeutic intervention, probiotics could be a potential adjunct treatment to prevent and treat COVID-19 and its associated psychological manifestations. Their anti-inflammatory effects have been seen directly via reducing plasma concentration of proinflammatory cytokines or indirectly via the suppression within the kynurenine pathway and restoration of gut permeability.

Additionally, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are crucial gut microbial metabolites with essential roles, including signaling along the microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis, maintaining blood-brain barrier’s (BBB) integrity, neuronal functions, neurotransmitters, and neurotrophic factors modulation.

Source: Angel Yun, Kuan Thye, Loh Teng, Hern Tan, Jodi Woan, Fei Law, Priyia Pusparajah, Vengadesh Letchumanan. Long COVID-19: Psychological symptoms in COVID-19 and probiotics as an adjunct therapy. Progress in Microbes and Molecular Biology. April 20, 2022. https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/pmmb/article/view/616/340 (Full text)

Persistent COVID-19 symptoms at least one month after diagnosis: A national survey

Abstract:

Background: Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is an important healthcare burden. We examined persistent symptoms in COVID-19 patients at least four weeks after the onset of infection, participants’ return to pre-COVID-19 health status and associated risk factors.

Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted (December 2020 to January 2021). A validated online questionnaire was sent to randomly selected individuals aged more than 14 years from a total of 1397,386 people confirmed to have COVID-19 at least 4 weeks prior to the start of this survey. This sample was drawn from the Saudi ministry of health COVID-19 testing registry system.

Results: Out of the 9507 COVID-19 patients who responded to the survey, 5946 (62.5%) of them adequately completed it. 2895 patients (48.7%) were aged 35-44 years, 64.4% were males, and 91.5% were Middle Eastern or North African. 79.4% experienced unresolved symptoms for at least 4 weeks after the disease onset. 9.3% were hospitalized with 42.7% visiting healthcare facility after discharge and 14.3% requiring readmission. The rates of main reported persistent symptoms in descending order were fatigue 53.5%, muscle and body ache 38.2%, loss of smell 35.0%, joint pain 30.5%, and loss of taste 29.1%. There was moderate correlation between the number of symptoms at the onset and post-four weeks of COVID-19 infection. Female sex, pre-existing comorbidities, increased number of baseline symptoms, longer hospital-stay, and hospital readmission were predictors of delayed return to baseline health state (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The symptoms of PACS are prevalent after contracting COVID-19 disease. Several risk factors could predict delayed return to baseline health state.

Source: Tleyjeh IM, Kashour T, Riaz M, Amer SA, AlSwaidan N, Almutairi L, Halwani R, Assiri A. Persistent COVID-19 symptoms at least one month after diagnosis: A national survey. J Infect Public Health. 2022 May;15(5):578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Apr 20. PMID: 35477145; PMCID: PMC9020835. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020835/ (Full text)

Long-COVID post-viral chronic fatigue syndrome and affective symptoms are associated with oxidative damage, lowered antioxidant defenses and inflammation: a proof of concept and mechanism study

Abstract:

The immune-inflammatory response during the acute phase of COVID-19, as assessed using peak body temperature (PBT) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), predicts the severity of chronic fatigue, depression and anxiety (“physio-affective”) symptoms three to four months later. The present study was performed to characterize whether the effects of SpO2 and PBT on the physio-affective phenome of Long COVID are mediated by immune, oxidative and nitrosative stress (IO&NS) pathways.

This study assayed SpO2 and PBT during acute COVID-19, and C-reactive protein (CRP), malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonyls (PCs), myeloperoxidase (MPO), nitric oxide (NO), zinc, and glutathione peroxidase (Gpx) in 120 Long COVID individuals and 36 controls. Cluster analysis showed that 31.7% of the Long COVID patients had severe abnormalities in SpO2, body temperature, increased oxidative toxicity (OSTOX) and lowered antioxidant defenses (ANTIOX), and increased total Hamilton Depression (HAMD) and Anxiety (HAMA) and Fibromylagia-Fatigue (FF) scores.

Around 60% of the variance in the physio-affective phenome of Long COVID (a factor extracted from HAMD, HAMA and FF scores) was explained by OSTOX/ANTIOX ratio, PBT and SpO2. Increased PBT predicted increased CRP and lowered ANTIOX and zinc levels, while lowered SpO2 predicted lowered Gpx and increased NO production. Both PBT and SpO2 strongly predict OSTOX/ATIOX during Long COVID.

In conclusion, the impact of acute COVID-19 on the physio-affective symptoms of Long COVID is partly mediated by OSTOX/ANTIOX, especially lowered Gpx and zinc, increased MPO and NO production and lipid peroxidation-associated aldehyde formation. Post-viral physio-affective symptoms have an inflammatory origin and are partly mediated by neuro-oxidative toxicity.

Source: Hussein Kadhem Al-HakeimHaneen Tahseen Al-RubayeDhurgham Shihab Al-HadrawiAbbas F. AlmullaMichael Maes. Long-COVID post-viral chronic fatigue syndrome and affective symptoms are associated with oxidative damage, lowered antioxidant defenses and inflammation: a proof of concept and mechanism study.

SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank

Abstract:

There is strong evidence for brain-related abnormalities in COVID-19 1-13 . It remains unknown however whether the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection can be detected in milder cases, and whether this can reveal possible mechanisms contributing to brain pathology. Here, we investigated brain changes in 785 UK Biobank participants (aged 51-81) imaged twice, including 401 cases who tested positive for infection with SARS-CoV-2 between their two scans, with 141 days on average separating their diagnosis and second scan, and 384 controls. The availability of pre-infection imaging data reduces the likelihood of pre-existing risk factors being misinterpreted as disease effects.

We identified significant longitudinal effects when comparing the two groups, including: (i) greater reduction in grey matter thickness and tissue-contrast in the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus, (ii) greater changes in markers of tissue damage in regions functionally-connected to the primary olfactory cortex, and (iii) greater reduction in global brain size. The infected participants also showed on average larger cognitive decline between the two timepoints. Importantly, these imaging and cognitive longitudinal effects were still seen after excluding the 15 cases who had been hospitalised. These mainly limbic brain imaging results may be the in vivo hallmarks of a degenerative spread of the disease via olfactory pathways, of neuroinflammatory events, or of the loss of sensory input due to anosmia. Whether this deleterious impact can be partially reversed, or whether these effects will persist in the long term, remains to be investigated with additional follow up.

Source: Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, Arthofer C, Wang C, McCarthy P, Lange F, Andersson JLR, Griffanti L, Duff E, Jbabdi S, Taschler B, Keating P, Winkler AM, Collins R, Matthews PM, Allen N, Miller KL, Nichols TE, Smith SM. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Mar 2:2021.06.11.21258690. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690. Update in: Nature. 2022 Mar 7;: PMID: 34189535; PMCID: PMC8240690. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046077/ (Full text)

Long COVID Citizen Scientists: Developing a Needs-Based Research Agenda by Persons Affected by Long COVID

Abstract:

Background: Long-term health consequences following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred to as post-COVID-19 condition or Long COVID, are increasing, with population-based prevalence estimates for adults at around 20%. Persons affected by Long COVID report various health problems, yet evidence to guide clinical decision making remains scarce.

Objective: The present study aimed to identify Long COVID research priorities using a citizen science approach and solely considering the needs of those affected.

Methods: This citizen science study followed an iterative process of patient needs identification, evaluation and prioritisation. A Long COVID Citizen Science Board (21 persons with Long COVID, and seven with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) and a Long COVID Working Group (25 persons with Long COVID, four patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and one relative) were formed. The study included four activities: three remote meetings and one online survey. First, Board members identified the needs and research questions. Second, Working Group members and persons affected by Long COVID (241 respondents, 85.5% with Long COVID, 14.5% with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and 7.1% relatives) evaluated the research questions on a 1-5 Likert scale using an online survey. Then the Board gave feedback on this evaluation. Finally, Board members set the priorities for research through voting and discussion.

Results: Sixty-eight research questions were generated by the Board and categorised into four research domains (medicine, healthcare services, socioeconomics and burden of disease) and 14 subcategories. Their average importance ratings were moderate to high and varied from 3.41 (standard deviation = 1.16) for sex-specific diagnostics to 4.86 (standard deviation = 0.41) for medical questions on treatment. Five topics were prioritised: “treatment, rehabilitation and chronic care management”, “availability of interfaces for treatment continuity”, “availability of healthcare structures”, “awareness and knowledge among professionals” and “prevalence of Long COVID in children and adolescents”.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study developing a citizen-driven, explicitly patient-centred research agenda with persons affected by Long COVID, setting it apart from existing multi-stakeholder efforts. The identified priorities could guide future research and funding allocation. Our methodology establishes a framework for citizen-driven research agendas, suitable for transfer to other diseases.

Source: Ziegler S, Raineri A, Nittas V, Rangelov N, Vollrath F, Britt C, Puhan MA. Long COVID Citizen Scientists: Developing a Needs-Based Research Agenda by Persons Affected by Long COVID. Patient. 2022 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00579-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35478078. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40271-022-00579-7 (Full text)

The incidence and characteristics of chronic pain and fatigue after 12 months later admitting with COVID-19; The Post- COVID 19 syndrome

Abstract:

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate chronic pain and fatigue in patients 12 months after hospitalization for Covid-19.

Methods: We studied the COVID-19 patients discharged from Hospital, March 10 and April 20, 2020.

Results: A total of 157 patients were included in this study. Forty-three patients (27.4%) complained of chronic fatigue and muscle weakness in the last six months. The visual analog fatigue scale (VAFS) score of 3.84 ± 1.48 was obtained. Forty patients (25.5%) were suspected of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).Twenty-four patients (15.3%) had severe chronic pain or exacerbation of previous chronic pain, most of which were reported in the lower back (70.8%) and lower extremities (66.7%). Pain intensity had a mean score of 2.33 ± 0.87 and was mainly described as “muscle cramps,” “persistent dull pain,” and “boring and numbing.” In women, chronic pain and fatigue, extended hospital stays, ICU admission, and depressed mood were common than in men.For these pain and fatigue, 37% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 16.3% used antidepressants. Only one person had applied for physiotherapy, and none of the patients had received psychotherapy.

Conclusion: Fatigue and chronic pain in patients recovering from COVID-19 are common complications, even after 12 months of illness.

Source: Janbazi L, Kazemian A, Mansouri K, Madani SP, Yousefi N, Vahedifard F, Raissi G. The incidence and characteristics of chronic pain and fatigue after 12 months later admitting with COVID-19; The Post- COVID 19 syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr 13. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002030. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35473921.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35473921/

Frailty assessment for COVID-19 follow-up: a prospective cohort study

Abstract:

Background: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is increasingly used for clinical decision making in acute care but little is known about frailty after COVID-19.

Objectives: To investigate frailty and the CFS for post-COVID-19 follow-up.

Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study included COVID-19 survivors aged ≥50 years presenting for a follow-up visit ≥3 months after the acute illness. Nine centres retrospectively collected pre-COVID-19 CFS and prospectively CFS at follow-up. Three centres completed the Frailty Index (FI), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), 30 s sit-to-stand test and handgrip strength measurements. Mixed effect logistic regression models accounting for repeated measurements and potential confounders were used to investigate factors associated with post-COVID-19 CFS. Criterion and construct validity were determined by correlating the CFS to other concurrently assessed frailty measurements and measures of respiratory impairment, respectively.

Results: Of the 288 participants 65% were men, mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9) years. Median (IQR) CFS at follow-up was 3 (2-3), 21% were vulnerable or frail (CFS ≥4). The CFS was responsive to change, correlated with the FI (r=0.69, p<0.001), the SPPB score (r=-0.48, p<0.001) (criterion validity) and with the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score (r=0.59, p<0.001), forced vital capacity %-predicted (r=-0.25, p<0.001), 6 min walk distance (r=-0.39, p<0.001) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) (r=0.59, p<0.001). Dyspnoea was significantly associated with a higher odds for vulnerability/frailty (per one mMRC adjusted OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.58), p=0.02).

Conclusions: The CFS significantly increases with COVID-19, and dyspnoea is an important risk factor for post-COVID-19 frailty and should be addressed thoroughly.

Source: Müller I, Mancinetti M, Renner A, Bridevaux PO, Brutsche MH, Clarenbach C, Garzoni C, Lenoir A, Naccini B, Ott S, Piquilloud L, Prella M, Que YA, Soccal PM, von Garnier C, Geiser TK, Funke-Chambour M, Guler S. Frailty assessment for COVID-19 follow-up: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Apr;9(1):e001227. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001227. PMID: 35459694. https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/9/1/e001227.long (Full text)

Global Prevalence of Post COVID-19 Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Abstract:

Introduction: This study aims to examine the worldwide prevalence of post COVID-19 condition, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and iSearch were searched on July 5, 2021 with verification extending to March 13, 2022. Using a random effects framework with DerSimonian-Laird estimator, we meta-analyzed post COVID-19 condition prevalence at 28+ days from infection.

Results: 50 studies were included, and 41 were meta-analyzed. Global estimated pooled prevalence of post COVID-19 condition was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.39,0.46). Hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients have estimates of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.44,0.63) and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.25,0.46), respectively. Regional prevalence estimates were Asia- 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37,0.65), Europe- 0.44 (95% CI: 0.32,0.56), and North America- 0.31 (95% CI: 0.21,0.43). Global prevalence for 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after infection were estimated to be 0.37 (95% CI: 0.26,0.49), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.15,0.38), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.14,0.57) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40,0.59), respectively. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported with a prevalence of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.17,0.30), followed by memory problems (0.14 [95% CI: 0.10,0.19]).

Discussion: This study finds post COVID-19 condition prevalence is substantial; the health effects of COVID-19 appear to be prolonged and can exert stress on the healthcare system.

Source: Chen C, Haupert SR, Zimmermann L, Shi X, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B. Global Prevalence of Post COVID-19 Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 16:jiac136. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac136. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35429399. https://academic.oup.com/jid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/infdis/jiac136/6569364?login=false (Full text available as PDF file)