Category: Medical Care

Paediatrician cleared of serious professional misconduct

A teenager who had been bedridden with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) for two years this week lost her High Court challenge to a decision by the General Medical Council to clear a paediatrician who tried to influence her treatment against her parents’ wishes.

Lawyers for the 18 year old, named only as Miss A, argued that the decision to find Christopher Cheetham not guilty of serious professional misconduct was legally flawed because the GMC had not considered whether he had been acting in breach of confidence.

But the judge, Mr Justice Charles, said the GMC had been concerned with a charge of serious professional misconduct, not an action for breach of confidence. The breach of confidence argument had not been advanced before the GMC, and it was under no duty to consider whether the charge of serious professional misconduct could have been established in an alternative way.

Dr Cheetham, then consultant paediatrician at Wycombe General Hospital, High Wycombe, saw Miss A at the age of 12 in 1997. She was bedridden with the illness from June 1997 to mid-1999 but has now substantially recovered.

The paediatrician, now retired, advocated an inpatient programme of psychotherapy and physiotherapy. Her parents disagreed, believing the illness was organic and she should be treated at home.

They withdrew consent for Dr Cheetham’s involvement in her treatment and consulted another paediatrician, who agreed that she should be treated at home under the care of her GP.

But Dr Cheetham disagreed with the treatment and continued to try to influence it for a further two years, writing letters to doctors involved in Miss A’s care. He also tried to access her medical records without consent and asked for test results.

You can read the rest of this article here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC403879/

 

Source: Dyer C. Paediatrician cleared of serious professional misconduct.  BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1035. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC403879/ (Full article)

 

Ideal versus reality: physicians perspectives on patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia

Abstract:

Encountering patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or fibromyalgia can cause dilemmas for physicians due to the uncertainty inherent in these illnesses. The aim of this study was to investigate: (1). How physicians in a Swedish sample describe and categorize patients with CFS and fibromyalgia; (2). What the character of CFS and fibromyalgia, with regard to diagnosing, treatment and medical knowledge/aetiology, mean to the physicians in encounters with patients; and (3). Which strategies physicians describe that they use in the encounter with these patients.

Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 26 physicians, specialists in various fields who all had some experience of either CFS or fibromyalgia. The results suggest that there is a discrepancy between the ideal role of the physician and reality in the everyday work in interaction with these patients. This may lead to the professional role being questioned. Different strategies are developed to handle the encounters with these patients. The results also illuminate the physician’s interpretations of patients in moralising terms. Conditions given the status of illness were regarded, for example, as less serious by the physicians than those with disease status. Scepticism was expressed regarding especially CFS, but also fibromyalgia.

Moreover, it is shown how the patients are characterised by the physicians as ambitious, active, illness focused, demanding and medicalising. The patient groups in question do not always gain full access to the sick-role, in part as a consequence of the conditions not being defined as diseases.

 

Source: Asbring P, Närvänen AL. Ideal versus reality: physicians perspectives on patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Aug;57(4):711-20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12821018

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome – medical fact or artifact

Abstract:

Despite extensive investigation, the enigma of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) continues to confound medical researchers. It is suggested that this may be due to two impediments inherent in their overall approach to the problem.

Firstly, although fatigue is central to CFS, medical scientists appear not to understand what fatigue itself really is, nor what is its purpose or mode of function. A functional definition of fatigue is suggested to help resolve this.

Secondly, physicians and other researchers – psychologists and alternative medicine practitioners – fail to observe an elementary and fundamental procedure of clinical medicine, namely, that of properly examining their patients before making a diagnosis or providing treatment. The notion of the ‘black hole’ of medicine is introduced. Recognizing the existence of these impediments is considered a self-evident precondition for further significant progress being made in this field.

 

Source: Eidelman D. Chronic fatigue syndrome – medical fact or artifact. Med Hypotheses. 2003 Jun;60(6):840-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12699708

 

AIDS and CFS/ME: a tale of two syndromes

Abstract:

Both HIV/AIDS and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) presented major challenges for medicine, science and society. This article explores what could have impeded investigation of–and specifically pharmaceutical engagement with–CFS/ME, in contrast to the impressive achievements seen in HIV/AIDS. It explores the obstruction of mind-body dualism in a historical context, and examines some of the possible obstacles to pharmaceutical enquiry. Nothing of real substance is identified that would justify the lack of investment and interest in solutions for patients with CFS/ME.

Comment in: AIDS and CFS/ME. [Clin Med (Lond). 2003]

 

Source: Pinching AJ. AIDS and CFS/ME: a tale of two syndromes. Clin Med (Lond). 2003 Jan-Feb;3(1):78-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12617422

 

Editorial on CFS was biased, inaccurate, and misleading

EDITOR—As a member of the chief medical officer’s working group on chronic fatigue syndrome, I consider that Straus has failed to appreciate the difficulties of deciding what constitutes evidence in an illness as uncertain and heterogeneous as this.1 He also misunderstood, or took out of context, some of the key conclusions and recommendations in the chief medical officer’s report.

Although it was agreed that evidence should not just be limited to the results of randomised controlled trials, the findings of the York systematic review were frequently cited. It was therefore disingenuous of Straus to state that information from this review did not influence the report’s conclusions about a wide range of therapeutic interventions. It did.

Equally, it would have been a serious omission if the report had failed to refer to the feedback from patients contained in three large surveys on attitudes to management, as well as two events where patients and carers met with the working group. All three surveys concluded that graded exercise as is currently being done made more people worse than any other intervention. Pacing, however, was found to be beneficial by around 90% of respondents. By dismissing such views as anecdote, Straus fails to appreciate that the Department of Health is encouraging patients to enter into a therapeutic relationship with the medical profession in the management of chronic conditions such as this.2

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122848/

 

Source: Shepherd C. Editorial on CFS was biased, inaccurate, and misleading. BMJ. 2002 Apr 13;324(7342):914. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122848/ (Full article)

 

Recognising chronic fatigue is key to improving outcomes

Comment in: Caring for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusions in CMO’s report are shaped by anecdote not evidence. [BMJ. 2002]

 

The government has finally issued its long awaited report on the management of chronic fatigue syndrome (also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis, or “ME”), after delaying publication earlier this month because several committee members resigned (5 January, p 7).

The report says that health professionals should recognise the condition as a chronic illness and that early recognition is key to improving outcomes.

Speaking at the launch, chief medical officer Professor Liam Donaldson acknowledged that the three years spent drawing up the report had been “enormously difficult, complex, and at some times controversial.”

“I’ve received a large amount of correspondence about this,” he said, admitting, “I’m a little surprised we have been able to get such a comprehensive and valuable report.”

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122065/

 

Source: Eaton L. Recognising chronic fatigue is key to improving outcomes. BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):131. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122065/ (Full article)

 

Caring for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusions in CMO’s report are shaped by anecdote not evidence

Comment on: Recognising chronic fatigue is key to improving outcomes. [BMJ. 2002]

 

In 1998, the chief medical officer of England and Wales commissioned a working group to advise on best practice guidelines to improve the quality of care and treatment for people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Now issued, the group’s report reflects the good efforts of the scholars, practitioners, patients, and advocates who joined to address this complex matter.1

Given the controversies surrounding chronic fatigue syndrome, it is not surprising that the report admits to broad domains of disagreement among its members. If anything, it is remarkable that most of the original group weathered the undertaking, as there were resignations both among patients who deemed the evolving product insufficiently sympathetic and among academic practitioners who chafed at recommendations untempered by data.

The report identifies the sentinel issues that concern patients and practitioners alike: how one makes the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome; the treatments to consider; and research that remains to be done. Unfortunately, despite more than 2000 relevant papers indexed on PubMed since chronic fatigue syndrome was first named in 1987, the group’s conclusions appear more shaped by anecdote than by evidence. In particular, major systematic reviews, including the recent one by Whiting et al, are not cited and do not seem to have significantly informed the guidelines.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122056/

 

Source: Straus SE. Caring for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusions in CMO’s report are shaped by anecdote not evidence. BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):124-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122056/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue report delayed as row breaks out over content

The government’s long awaited report on the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome could be in jeopardy after four key members resigned from the working group.

The move throws doubt on the validity of the report, which was due to be published in the first week of January. As the BMJ went to press, the chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson, had postponed its launch on 4 January 2002.

A total of 10 people from the original working group have resigned for various reasons since it was set up in 1998. The most recent resignations were highlighted in a written question by the Countess of Mar to health minister Lord Hunt on 17 December.

Two psychiatrists, a public health doctor, and a nurse therapist have resigned, saying that the report plays down the psychological and social aspects of the condition and concentrates on a medical model. Two patients are understood to have also resigned recently.

The group was set up to consider how best the NHS could care for people with the syndrome, also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis or “ME.”

But with so little still known about what causes the syndrome, how to diagnose it, and how best to treat it, it is understood that the report fails to provide the straightforward answers doctors may have hoped for.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121974/

 

Source: Eaton L. Chronic fatigue report delayed as row breaks out over content. BMJ. 2002 Jan 5;324(7328):7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121974/ (Full article)

 

Patients’ perceptions of medical care in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This study investigated perceptions of medical care among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) referred to a specialist clinic. Sixty-eight patients completed a questionnaire survey on their overall satisfaction with medical care received since the onset of their illness, and their views on specific aspects of care.

Two-thirds of patients were dissatisfied with the quality of medical care received. Dissatisfied patients were significantly more likely to describe delay, dispute or confusion over diagnosis; to have received and rejected a psychiatric diagnosis; to perceive doctors as dismissive, skeptical or not knowledgeable about CFS and to feel that the advice given was inadequate or conflicting.

Satisfied patients were significantly more likely to perceive doctors as caring, supportive and interested in their illness; to state that they did not expect their doctors to cure CFS and to perceive their GP or hospital doctor as the source of greatest help during their illness. Many patients were critical of the paucity of treatment, but this was not associated with overall satisfaction.

The findings suggest that medical care was evaluated less on the ability of doctors to treat CFS, and more on their interpersonal and informational skills. Dissatisfaction with these factors is likely to impede the development of a therapeutic doctor-patient alliance, which is central to the effective management of CFS. The findings suggest a need for better communication and better education of doctors in the diagnosis and management of CFS.

 

Source: Deale A, Wessely S. Patients’ perceptions of medical care in chronic fatigue syndrome. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(12):1859-64. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11352411

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: gender differences in the search for legitimacy

Abstract:

This study employs qualitative research methods to describe and compare the experiences of men and women with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), focusing on respondents’ self-perceived illness experience and relationship with medical practitioners. Data were collected from 59 respondents (18 male, 41 female) in telephone interviews using an open-ended focus interview schedule. While respondents explained the causes of the disease in ways that were largely gender appropriate, they did not experience the disease itself in gender different ways. The evidence of the study points to a clear dichotomy between ways in which men and women experience the disease and differences in the ways in which they are treated by the medical profession.

 

Source: Clarke JN. Chronic fatigue syndrome: gender differences in the search for legitimacy. Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Dec;8(4):123-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10855087