Conference – Page 5 – American ME and CFS Society

Abstract:

The relationship of herpesviruses to chronic fatigue syndrome has received considerable attention over the past decade. Data suggesting an association fall into three major categories.

First, among acute precipitants of the syndrome are primary infections with some herpesviruses, most notably Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus.

Second, a series of studies have detailed elevations of antibodies to most herpesviruses in selected chronic fatigue syndrome populations, with Epstein-Barr virus and human herpes type 6 being the objects of most scrutiny.

Third, one recent study reported a greater ease of recovery of human herpes virus type 6 from chronic fatigue syndrome patients. This review article critically examines the cumulative data regarding an association between one or more herpesviruses and the chronic fatigue syndrome in the context of the known biology and epidemiology of these agents.

In view of these, and additional considerations regarding study methodologies, the conclusion is drawn that herpesviruses are not dominant causes of the chronic fatigue syndrome and may not even be necessary to the perpetuation of the illness, but it is premature to dismiss entirely this latter possibility.

Source: Straus SE. Studies of herpesvirus infection in chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:132-9; discussion 139-45. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8387907

Abstract:

A workshop was held 18 to 19 March 1991 at the National Institutes of Health to address critical issues in research concerning the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Case definition, confounding diagnoses, and medical outcome assessment by laboratory and other means were considered from the perspectives of key medical specialties involved in CFS research.

It was recommended that published Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case-definition criteria be modified to exclude fewer patients from analysis because of a history of psychiatric disorder. Specific recommendations were made concerning the inclusion or exclusion of other major confounding diagnoses, and a standard panel of laboratory tests was specified for initial patient evaluation.

The workshop emphasized the importance of recognizing other conditions that could explain the patient’s symptoms and that may be treatable. It was viewed as essential for the investigator to screen for psychiatric disorder using a combination of self-report instruments followed by at least one structured interview to identify patients who should be excluded from studies or considered as a separate subgroup in data analysis.

Because CFS is not a homogeneous abnormality and because there is no single pathogenic mechanism, research progress may depend upon delineation of these and other patient subgroups for separate data analysis. Despite preliminary data, no physical finding or laboratory test was deemed confirmatory of the diagnosis of CFS.

For assessment of clinical status, investigators must rely on the use of standardized instruments for patient self-reporting of fatigue, mood disturbance, functional status, sleep disorder, global well-being, and pain. Further research is needed to develop better instruments for quantifying these domains in patients with CFS.

Source: Schluederberg A, Straus SE, Peterson P, Blumenthal S, Komaroff AL, Spring SB, Landay A, Buchwald D. NIH conference. Chronic fatigue syndrome research. Definition and medical outcome assessment. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Aug 15;117(4):325-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1322076