Category: Case Definition

A report–chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research

Introduction:

Patients who present with a principal complaint of disabling fatigue of uncertain cause have received much attention in recent years. Correspondingly there has been an increasing amount of research into this problem. The findings have however often been contradictory. Resolution of these contradictions depends on the ability to compare research studies, but such constructive comparison has rarely been possible. This is largely because research has been carried out by investigators trained in different disciplines, using different criteria to define the condition. Whilst such an eclectic approach is to be welcomed, agreement on case definition, and assessment methods is necessary if progress is to be made.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293107/pdf/jrsocmed00127-0072.pdf

 

Source: Sharpe MC, Archard LC, Banatvala JE, Borysiewicz LK, Clare AW, David A, Edwards RH, Hawton KE, Lambert HP, Lane RJ, et al. A report–chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research. J R Soc Med. 1991 Feb;84(2):118-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293107/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: issues in the diagnosis and estimation of incidence

Abstract:

This article critiques the current working definition of chronic fatigue syndrome. The concerns raised about the current working definition are the following: prolonged or excessive exertion is not addressed explicitly; duration and quality of bed rest are not specified; a socioeconomic ascertainment bias is present; data from history and physical findings are not clearly separated and are relegated to minor criteria; and the rigor of neurologic and psychiatric evaluations is not specified.

We propose a flow chart that addresses the possible modes of evolution of chronic fatigue syndrome for patients; this chart may yield more homogeneous subgroups of individuals with this syndrome or enable some patients to avert the syndrome.

 

Source: Armon C, Kurland LT. Chronic fatigue syndrome: issues in the diagnosis and estimation of incidence. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S68-72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2020804

 

Defining the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The recently published working definition of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a necessary first step toward a consistent effort to research this controversial illness. Before this definition was developed, cases often were defined vaguely, according to the perceptions and biases of the individual researchers, so that the results of some studies were unclear. However, few specific diagnostic parameters for CFS exist, and the new definition may not delineate a single clinicopathologic entity.

Future efforts at researching this illness should be aimed at identifying parameters that differentiate CFS from psychiatric conditions such as major depression and from other defined chronic diseases. Because CFS may be the result of multiple disease processes, the separate study of well-defined subgroups of patients with CFS is appropriate.

Such subgroups of patients are probably more likely to have common pathogenetic features than are patients with CFS as a whole group.

 

Source: Holmes GP. Defining the chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S53-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2020802

 

The chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis)–myth or mystery?

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or myalgic encephalomyelitis has caused great confusion, misunderstanding and perhaps even mismanagement of many persons presenting with a variety of combinations of ill-defined complaints. The history, possible pathogenesis and clinical features, of what is probably in most instances a post-viral infection syndrome, are reviewed. The recent Centers for Disease Control case definition is summarised and simplified. The need for such uniformity of definition, acceptable to most workers in the field, is emphasised in order to facilitate further studies into the cause, diagnosis, course and treatment of CFS. The difficulty in treating this condition and the currently recommended management are described. Double-blind controlled studies are essential in assessing any proposed new treatment.

 

Source: Spracklen FH. The chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis)–myth or mystery? S Afr Med J. 1988 Nov 5;74(9):448-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3055363

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition

Abstract:

The chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome is a poorly defined symptom complex characterized primarily by chronic or recurrent debilitating fatigue and various combinations of other symptoms, including sore throat, lymph node pain and tenderness, headache, myalgia, and arthralgias.

Although the syndrome has received recent attention, and has been diagnosed in many patients, the chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome has not been defined consistently. Despite the name of the syndrome, both the diagnostic value of Epstein-Barr virus serologic tests and the proposed causal relationship between Epstein-Barr virus infection and patients who have been diagnosed with the chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome remain doubtful.

We propose a new name for the chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome–the chronic fatigue syndrome–that more accurately describes this symptom complex as a syndrome of unknown cause characterized primarily by chronic fatigue. We also present a working definition for the chronic fatigue syndrome designed to improve the comparability and reproducibility of clinical research and epidemiologic studies, and to provide a rational basis for evaluating patients who have chronic fatigue of undetermined cause.

 

Source: Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM, Komaroff AL, Schonberger LB, Straus SE, Jones JF, Dubois RE, Cunningham-Rundles C, Pahwa S, et al. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Mar;108(3):387-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2829679