Introduction:
The term long COVID, also known as post-COVID-19 condition, was coined in spring, 2020, by individuals with ongoing symptoms following COVID-19 in response to unsatisfactory recognition of this emerging syndrome by health-care practitioners.
In September to November, 2020, clinical codes for persistent post-COVID-19 condition and related referrals were introduced and became available for use by health-care practitioners to record details of clinical encounters in electronic health records (EHRs) in England. EHRs, which cover a large proportion of individuals living in England, are increasingly used to help understand the epidemiology of disease alongside the effectiveness and safety of interventions.
Many factors influence the completeness of information in EHRs, including help-seeking behaviour of patients and the discretion and data-recording behaviour of practitioners. Longitudinal population-based studies often include participant self-reports of illness; hence, these studies might be subject to reporting and participation biases. Comparing reported illness in studies to recorded illness in the EHRs of the same individuals might be helpful in understanding the epidemiology and clinical recognition of emerging conditions such as long COVID.
Source: Knuppel A, Boyd A, Macleod J, Chaturvedi N, Williams DM. The long COVID evidence gap in England. Lancet. 2024 May 6:S0140-6736(24)00744-X. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00744-X. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38729195. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)00744-X/fulltext (Full text)