Opinion:
In April 2024, The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Handbook of Non-Drug Interventions (HANDI)committee published a guideline: Incremental physical activity for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis.1 The HANDI committee claims to recommend interventions that are based on ‘solid evidence’.2 But is this always the case?
An evaluation under the AGREE II instrument for assessing guidelines scored the RACGP guideline at only 2% for rigour of development.3 Alarmingly, the guideline provides no evidence of a systematic review of the literature, nor an analysis of the strengths and limitations of the three cited papers: the PACE trial; the Cochrane review, Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome; and Fawzy et al’s systematic review of treatments for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome [PACS]).1,4,5,6 Indeed, the PACE trial has been heavily criticised for outcome switching and bias.7–9 If the PACE trial had adhered to the original definition of recovery laid out at the beginning of the study, only 4% of graded exercise therapy participants would have been classified as recovered, and the effect would not have been statistically significant.9 After participants had completed therapy, the study’s authors weakened the definition of recovery to encompass values that fall far below healthy norms. In fact, many ‘recovered’ participants were still sick enough to meet the entry requirements to the study.8 Worse, some participants were classified as recovered or improved before undertaking any treatment.10
Read the rest of this article HERE>>
Source: Jacqueline Stallard Stephan Praet Sandeep Gupta Angela Smith. Is the RACGP HANDI recommendation of incremental physical activity for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis harming patients? AJGP, Viewpoint
Volume 55, Issue 3, March 2026. https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2026/march/is-the-racgp-handi-recommendation-of-incremental-p (Full text)