Abstract:
In Paper I, we evaluated Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS) in blood and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of monocytes in peripheral blood (PBMC), and compared HBOT and HIIT in ten healthy volunteers. We could measure ROS in blood in the same physiological range in both interventions. We also discovered pathways involved in adaption to hypoxia and inflammation that were similar in both interventions. In Papers II and III, we evaluated harms and explored RNAseq in PBMC in an open label RCT where 31 patients with severe COVID- 19 were randomised to HBOT or best practice. We observed similar frequencies of adverse events (AEs) in the two groups and could not see any negative effect on vital signs or oxygenation. We discovered a unique transcriptomic signature in the subjects that had received HBOT. The differentially expressed genes were associated with the unfolded protein response, apoptosis, and immune response. In Paper IV, we evaluated harms and described health related quality of life (HRQoL)in an interim analysis of the first 20 subjects froma placebo controlled RCT where 80 patients with Long COIVD were randomised to HBOT or sham treatment. We reported more AEs than expected and severe physical and mental disabilities with a very poor HRQoL. Most AEs were mild, and all were transient.
We have shown that HBOT shares similarities in immune response with HIIT in healthy volunteers. HBOT has a favourable profile of harms and has a potent immunomodulatory effect that is associated with fast recovery for critical COVID-19 patients. HBOT has a favourable profile of harms for patients with post COVID-19 condition. The results provide a base for future clinical trials with HBOT.