Comment on: Recognising chronic fatigue is key to improving outcomes. [BMJ. 2002]
In 1998, the chief medical officer of England and Wales commissioned a working group to advise on best practice guidelines to improve the quality of care and treatment for people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Now issued, the group’s report reflects the good efforts of the scholars, practitioners, patients, and advocates who joined to address this complex matter.1
Given the controversies surrounding chronic fatigue syndrome, it is not surprising that the report admits to broad domains of disagreement among its members. If anything, it is remarkable that most of the original group weathered the undertaking, as there were resignations both among patients who deemed the evolving product insufficiently sympathetic and among academic practitioners who chafed at recommendations untempered by data.
The report identifies the sentinel issues that concern patients and practitioners alike: how one makes the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome; the treatments to consider; and research that remains to be done. Unfortunately, despite more than 2000 relevant papers indexed on PubMed since chronic fatigue syndrome was first named in 1987, the group’s conclusions appear more shaped by anecdote than by evidence. In particular, major systematic reviews, including the recent one by Whiting et al, are not cited and do not seem to have significantly informed the guidelines.
You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122056/
Source: Straus SE. Caring for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusions in CMO’s report are shaped by anecdote not evidence. BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):124-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122056/ (Full article)