Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Importance: Neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms that persist or develop three months after the onset of COVID-19 pose a significant threat to the global healthcare system. These symptoms are yet to be synthesized and quantified via meta-analysis.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms reported 12 weeks (3 months) or more after acute COVID-19 onset in adults.

Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Scopus was conducted for studies published between January 1st, 2020 and August 1st, 2021. The systematic review was guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Study selection: Studies were included if the length of follow-up satisfied the National Institute for Healthcare Excellence (NICE) definition of post-COVID-19 syndrome (symptoms that develop or persist ≥3 months after the onset of COVID-19). Additional criteria included the reporting of neurological or neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with COVID-19.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two authors independently extracted data on patient characteristics, hospital and/or ICU admission, acute-phase COVID-19 symptoms, length of follow-up, and neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Main outcome(s) and measure(s): The primary outcome was the prevalence of neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms reported ≥3 months post onset of COVID-19. We also compared post-COVID-19 syndrome in hospitalised vs. non-hospitalised patients, with vs. without ICU admission during the acute phase of infection, and with mid-term (3 to 6 months) and long-term (>6 months) follow-up.

Results: Of 1458 articles, 19 studies, encompassing a total of 11,324 patients, were analysed. Overall prevalence for neurological post-COVID-19 symptoms were: fatigue (37%, 95% CI: 24%-50%), brain fog (32%, 9%-55%), memory issues (27%, 18%-36%), attention disorder (22%, 10%-34%), myalgia (18%, 4%-32%), anosmia (12%, 7%-17%), dysgeusia (11%, 4%-17%) and headache (10%, 1%-21%). Neuropsychiatric conditions included sleep disturbances (31%, 18%-43%), anxiety (23%, 13%-33%) and depression (12%, 7%-21%). Neuropsychiatric symptoms substantially increased in prevalence between mid- and long-term follow-up. Compared to non-hospitalised patients, patients hospitalised for acute COVID-19 had reduced frequency of anosmia, anxiety, depression, dysgeusia, fatigue, headache, myalgia, and sleep disturbance at three (or more) months post-infection. Conversely, hospital admission was associated with higher frequency of memory issues (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4-2.3). Cohorts with >20% of patients admitted to the ICU during acute COVID-19 experienced higher prevalence of fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances than cohorts with <20% of ICU admission.

Conclusions and relevance: Fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (brain fog, memory issues, attention disorder) and sleep disturbances appear to be key features of post-COVID-19 syndrome. Psychiatric manifestations (sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression) are common and increase significantly in prevalence over time. Randomised controlled trials are necessary to develop intervention strategy to reduce disease burden.

Source: Premraj L, Kannapadi NV, Briggs J, Seal SM, Battaglini D, Fanning J, Suen J, Robba C, Fraser J, Cho SM. Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan 29;434:120162. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35121209; PMCID: PMC8798975. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798975/ (Full text)

Long-COVID diagnosis: From diagnostic to advanced AI-driven models

Abstract:

SARS-COV 2 is recognized to be responsible for a multi-organ syndrome. In most patients, symptoms are mild. However, in certain subjects, COVID-19 tends to progress more severely. Most of the patients infected with SARS-COV2 fully recovered within some weeks. In a considerable number of patients, like many other viral infections, various long-lasting symptoms have been described, now defined as “long COVID-19 syndrome”. Given the high number of contagious over the world, it is necessary to understand and comprehend this emerging pathology to enable early diagnosis and improve patents outcomes.

In this scenario, AI-based models can be applied in long-COVID-19 patients to assist clinicians and at the same time, to reduce the considerable impact on the care and rehabilitation unit. The purpose of this manuscript is to review different aspects of long-COVID-19 syndrome from clinical presentation to diagnosis, highlighting the considerable impact that AI can have.

Source: Cau R, Faa G, Nardi V, Balestrieri A, Puig J, Suri JS, SanFilippo R, Saba L. Long-COVID diagnosis: From diagnostic to advanced AI-driven models. Eur J Radiol. 2022 Jan 19;148:110164. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110164. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35114535; PMCID: PMC8791239. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791239/ (Full text)

Functional gastrointestinal and somatoform symptoms five months after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A controlled cohort study

Abstract:

Background: Gastrointestinal infections represent a risk factor for functional gastrointestinal and somatoform extraintestinal disorders. We investigated the prevalence and relative risk (RR) of gastrointestinal and somatoform symptoms 5 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with a control cohort.

Methods: One hundred and sixty-four SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and 183 controls responded to an online questionnaire about symptoms and signs during the acute phase of the infection and after 4.8 ± 0.3 months. Presence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms, somatization, anxiety, and depression were recorded with standardized questionnaires. Stool form and presence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were also recorded. Any association between exposure to infection and symptoms was evaluated by calculating crude and adjusted RR values and score differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Key results: Fever, dyspnea, loss of smell/taste/weight, diarrhea, myalgia, arthralgia, and asthenia were reported by more than 40% of patients during the acute phase. Compared with controls, adjusted RRs for loose stools, chronic fatigue, and somatization were increased after infection: 1.88 (95% CI 0.99-3.54), 2.24 (95% CI 1.48-3.37), and 3.62 (95% CI 1.01-6.23), respectively. Gastrointestinal sequelae were greater in patients with diarrhea during the acute phase.

Conclusions & inferences: Mild gastroenterological symptoms persist 5 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, in particular in patients reporting diarrhea in the acute phase. Infected patients are at increased risk of chronic fatigue and somatoform disorders, thus supporting the hypothesis that both functional gastrointestinal and somatoform disorders may have a common biological origin.

Source: Noviello D, Costantino A, Muscatello A, Bandera A, Consonni D, Vecchi M, Basilisco G. Functional gastrointestinal and somatoform symptoms five months after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A controlled cohort study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Feb;34(2):e14187. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14187. Epub 2021 Jun 1. PMID: 34060710; PMCID: PMC8209890. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209890/ (Full text)

A Natural History of Disease Framework for Improving the Prevention, Management, and Research on Post-viral Fatigue Syndrome and Other Forms of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

We propose a framework for the treatment, rehabilitation, and research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) using a natural history of disease approach to outline the distinct disease stages, with an emphasis on cases following infection to provide insights into prevention.

Moving away from the method of subtyping patients based on the various phenotypic presentations and instead reframing along the lines of disease progression could help with defining the distinct stages of disease, each of which would benefit from large prospective cohort studies to accurately describe the pathological mechanisms taking place therein. With a better understanding of these mechanisms, management and research can be tailored specifically for each disease stage.

Pre-disease and early disease stages call for management strategies that may decrease the risk of long-term morbidity, by focusing on avoidance of further insults, adequate rest to enable recovery, and pacing of activities.

Later disease stages require a more holistic and tailored management approach, with treatment—as this becomes available—targeting the alleviation of symptoms and multi-systemic dysfunction.

More stringent and standardised use of case definitions in research is critical to improve generalisability of results and to create the strong evidence-based policies for management that are currently lacking in ME/CFS.

Source: O’Boyle S, Nacul L, Nacul FE, Mudie K, Kingdon CC, Cliff JM, Clark TG, Dockrell HM and Lacerda EM. A Natural History of Disease Framework for Improving the Prevention, Management, and Research on Post-viral Fatigue Syndrome and Other Forms of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Front. Med. 8:688159. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.688159/full (Full text)

Oral Minocycline Challenge as a Potential First-Line Therapy for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Long Covid-19 Syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome characterized by severe disabling fatigue, prolonged post-exertional malaise, and unrefreshing sleep markedly reduces the activities of daily living and impairs the quality of life.

Central nervous system dysfunction associated with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) has been postulated as the main cause of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Recently, oral minocycline therapy has been reported to exert favorable therapeutic effects in some patients with ME, especially in the initial stage of the disease, although many patients discontinued treatment in the first few days because of acute adverse effects such as nausea and/or dizziness.

Minocycline appeared to exert a variety of biologic actions against neural inflammation that are independent of their anti-microbial activity, including anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and neuroprotective effects.

In recent years, it has been noted that COVID-19 disease may cause persistent signs and symptoms described as post-COVID syndrome or long COVID, in which the clinical presentation is remarkably similar to those seen in patients with ME.

A wide range of infectious agents have been suggested to trigger the development of ME, and one of such pathogens may be the COVID-19 virus.

Recently, I had a valuable experience of a 22-year-old female patient with a 14-month duration of long COVID who completely recovered from ME-like symptoms after treatment with minocycline. This case suggests that oral minocycline could be an effective first-line therapy for long COVID-19, although a large scale of trial is obviously needed to justify the therapy.

Source: Miwa K. Oral Minocycline Challenge as a Potential First-Line Therapy for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Long Covid-19 Syndrome. Ann Clin Med Case Rep. 2022; V8(7): 1-4 https://acmcasereport.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ACMCR-v8-1710.pdf  (Full article available as PDF file)

Oral Bacteriotherapy Reduces the Occurrence of Chronic Fatigue in COVID-19 Patients

Abstract:

Long COVID refers to patients with symptoms as fatigue, “brain fog,” pain, suggesting the chronic involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) in COVID-19. The supplementation with probiotic (OB) would have a positive effect on metabolic homeostasis, negatively impacting the occurrence of symptoms related to the CNS after hospital discharge. On a total of 58 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 24 (41.4%) received OB during hospitalization (OB+) while 34 (58.6%) taken only the standard treatment (OB-). Serum metabolomic profiling of patients has been performed at both hospital acceptance (T0) and discharge (T1). Six months after discharge, fatigue perceived by participants was assessed by administrating the Fatigue Assessment Scale. 70.7% of participants reported fatigue while 29.3% were negative for such condition. The OB+ group showed a significantly lower proportion of subjects reporting fatigue than the OB- one (p < 0.01). Furthermore, OB+ subjects were characterized by significantly increased concentrations of serum Arginine, Asparagine, Lactate opposite to lower levels of 3-Hydroxyisobutirate than those not treated with probiotics. Our results strongly suggest that in COVID-19, the administration of probiotics during hospitalization may prevent the development of chronic fatigue by impacting key metabolites involved in the utilization of glucose as well as in energy pathways.

Source: Santinelli L, Laghi L, Innocenti GP, Pinacchio C, Vassalini P, Celani L, Lazzaro A, Borrazzo C, Marazzato M, Tarsitani L, Koukopoulos AE, Mastroianni CM, d’Ettorre G, Ceccarelli G. Oral Bacteriotherapy Reduces the Occurrence of Chronic Fatigue in COVID-19 Patients. Front Nutr. 2022 Jan 12;8:756177. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.756177. PMID: 35096923; PMCID: PMC8790565. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790565/ (Full text)

Recognising and bearing the burden of long COVID-related disability

Long COVID is nicely discussed by Burke and del Rio in a short article in Lancet Infectious Diseases .1 The UK is world leading in having two large, high-quality prevalence studies of COVID-19 in the ONS Infection Survey2 and REACT3 (but this advantage is thrown away when politicians ignore the findings).

The ONS infection survey has strong design, and estimates 1.3% or 862 000 people with long COVID symptoms persisting for more than 12 weeks, including 0.26% or 177 000 reporting daily activities limited a lot, with 98 000 of these being first infected more than a year ago.2 REACT also found a high prevalence of persistent symptoms.3 This represents a large burden of disability for individuals, their supporters, and the economy, with GPs on the frontline. Yes, this is self-reported survey data, but the ONS measure of activity restriction is academically respectable.4 Focusing on activity restriction captures severity and impact, and sidesteps issues with symptom lists while long COVID remains poorly understood. Corroboration is required, and, with political will, these numbers could be cross-checked with routine data such as school and work absences in a matter of weeks.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Spiers N. Recognising and bearing the burden of long COVID-related disability. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):70. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X718361. PMID: 35091402. https://bjgp.org/content/72/715/85.full (Full text)

Long COVID in general practice: an analysis of the equity of NHS England’s enhanced service specification

Introduction:

On 5 September 2021, 1.7% of the UK population reported suffering from prolonged symptoms 4 weeks after COVID-19 infection, the syndrome becoming known as long COVID,1 most commonly causing fatigue, headaches, and attention difficulties.2

Despite the vaccination programme, in the autumn of 2021 approximately 40 000 COVID-19 cases were still being recorded daily, of which an estimated 3.0–11.7% will subsequently develop long COVID.3,4 Therefore, long COVID will continue to be a problem into the future.

Deprived populations have a greater prevalence of diseases, which render them at greater risk of serious illness with COVID-19, as well as social factors that increase viral exposure such as dense housing or occupational exposure.5 Meanwhile, the inverse care law means these populations have more limited access to healthcare services, demonstrated in part by the lower numbers of GPs per patient in deprived populations,6,7

General practice is the first point of contact of the NHS for these patients. Therefore, the commissioning and funding of services in general practice for patients with long COVID needs to take account of these factors to prevent a continuation or exacerbation of the disproportionate COVID-19 impact on deprived populations.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Hutchinson J, Checkland K, Munford L, Khavandi S, Sutton M. Long COVID in general practice: an analysis of the equity of NHS England’s enhanced service specification. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):85-86. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X718505. PMID: 35091414. https://bjgp.org/content/72/715/85.full (Full text)

Using condition specific patient reported outcome measures for long covid

Management expert Peter Drucker’s famous words “if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” holds good for post-covid syndrome, or long covid, which affects an estimated two million individuals in the UK 1 and extrapolated prevalence data suggests more than 50 million individuals may be affected worldwide.2 Long covid is a multisystem condition with over 200 symptoms reported across most of the organ systems, often with a chronic fluctuating pattern of presentation.3 With up to 30% of covid-19 health burden being related to covid induced disability, long covid presents substantial challenges for healthcare systems worldwide.4 Management of this complex syndrome, in part, requires new integrated long covid services with expertise drawn from a range of specialists across disciplines from both primary and secondary care.56 Healthcare services globally are investing in these new pathways of care, but there are no agreed measurement metrics yet to comprehensively capture patient experience or the effectiveness of treatments, partly due to lack of clear biomarkers for the condition.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are questionnaire tools to ascertain patients’ views of their symptoms, their functional status, and their health-related quality of life.7 PROM use in other routine clinical contexts have been shown to facilitate communication, engage patients in their care, tailor care to individual patients’ needs, and show value for money for those investing in the services.89 Clinical outcome assessments should include clinically important concepts that define the disease in the target population, assess the impact of disease, and reflect the lived experience of those with the condition. Given the large scale, relative novelty, and multifariousness of long covid syndrome, coupled with shortcomings in understanding viral-onset illness, it is unsurprising that standardised assessments of functioning, disability, and health are lacking.1011

Currently long covid services are using PROMs developed for other conditions such respiratory conditions (Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale), anxiety disorder (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire) and a range of other symptom-specific PROMs that have not yet been validated for use with long covid. However, this approach has several limitations. Such measures, in our experience, are cognitively burdensome to long covid patients, do not comprehensively capture the spectrum of symptoms, cannot directly engage with the underlying biological mechanisms, and are reported not to be meaningful by patients, families, and clinicians. Using a range of symptom specific measures makes it challenging to repeat the measures frequently to capture day by day fluctuations and are difficult to implement in busy services overburdened with managing such a large caseload of patients. There is the added danger of misleading management, for example individuals scoring highly on anxiety scores may get diverted to psychological services when their anxiety is being driven by underlying dysautonomia (increased heart rate) which needs medical optimisation.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Sivan M, Wright S, Hughes S, Calvert M. Using condition specific patient reported outcome measures for long covid. BMJ. 2022 Jan 28;376:o257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o257. PMID: 35091425. https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o257 (Full text)

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome post coronavirus disease 2019

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been the most impactful infectious disease in the 21st century. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly increased the number of patients and deaths worldwide. Long-course diseases related to COVID-19, which present with persistent reparatory distress or fatigue (so-called long COVID) have been reported in adult and pediatric patients since the latter half of 2020. Long-COVID is observed as a persistent symptom after the acute phase of the disease.1 Recent research suggested that it can present with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).2 We report a case of long COVID to contribute to the body of knowledge regarding this disease, which has not been well investigated in children.

A 14-year-old boy with well controlled asthma, controlled by a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, long-acting beta-agonist, and corticosteroid inhaler, was admitted to our hospital for severe fatigue and appetite loss. He suffered from COVID-19 diagnosed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction 90 days prior to hospitalization. He presented with a low-grade fever, mild cough, dysgeusia, and dysosmia. He was placed under quarantine in a hotel room for 6 days. His low-grade fever and mild cough resolved after 10 days, while the dysgeusia and dysosmia disappeared within a month. He presented with gradually progressive upper limb muscle weakness, severe fatigue, and difficulty concentrating (so-called “brain fog”) 20 days before hospitalization (70 days after the onset of COVID-19). He was unable to commute to attend junior high school. Three days before hospitalization, the patient did not eat due to appetite loss. He received oral prednisolone (20 mg/day) and Kanpō medicine (Rikkun-shito and Hotyu-ekkito). However, his symptoms were not relieved, and the patient was hospitalized. At the time of hospitalization, he did not present with fever, dyspnea, or desaturation. Physical examination revealed an upper limb strength of grade 4 on manual muscle testing, but the tendon reflexes or sensory/motor nerve abnormalities were not noted in the extremities. Blood tests revealed normal white blood cell and C-reactive protein levels. Epstein–Barr virus and human immunodeficiency virus antibodies and antinuclear antibodies were not detected. The 10 min standing test revealed an increase of 52 heartbeats after standing at an upright position (from 81 to 133 beats/min). The patient was diagnosed with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). After the test, the patient complained of worsening fatigue, suggesting post-exertional malaise (PEM), a specific characteristic of ME/CFS. Based on the clinical course and physical examination, the patient was diagnosed with ME/CFS due to long-COVID. Oral prednisolone was discontinued, while the Kanpō medicine was continued. The patient then developed alopecia. Meanwhile, his muscle weakness and fatigue were alleviated by activity restriction due to hospitalization. On the 14th day of admission, he was discharged because his appetite improved, and he was referred to a hospital that specifically tended to chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Neither brain imaging nor electroencephalography were performed throughout the patient’s hospitalization.

The National Institute for Health Research in England classified long-COVID into four categories, namely, post-ICU syndrome, long-term organ damage, post-viral syndrome, and an entirely novel syndrome.3 Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is typical of post-viral syndromes in adults, and similar cases have also been reported in children.4 Females are more likely to suffer from the disease, but males could also be affected. The exacerbation of symptoms upon exertion is known as PEM; avoiding extensive work is the essential aspect of ME/CFS management.5 In this case, the patient’s muscle fatigue and weakness dramatically improved with activity restriction due to hospitalization. This strategy may be useful for treating the severe exacerbation of ME/CFS. Chronic fatigue syndrome is diagnosed based on the persistence of symptoms for more than 6 months.2 This implies that patients have to wait for 6 months to be diagnosed with ME/CFS. Thus, new diagnostic criteria, specifically for ME/CFS due to COVID, are required to allow early intervention. Petracek et al. reported that POTS might be an early sign of COVID-induced ME/CFS,4 POTS is considered to be a viable diagnostic criterion. To prepare for a surge of pediatric ME/CFS, the diagnostic and treatment algorithm for the disease should be standardized, and physicians need to know about or recognize the disease.

Read more HERE.

Source: Kusama Y, Fukui S, Maruyama M, Kamimura K, Maihara T. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome post coronavirus disease 2019. Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e14976. doi: 10.1111/ped.14976. PMID: 35143110. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ped.14976 (Full text)